Thursday, December 4, 2008

Can independent Trusted Services Managers (TSMs) flourish?

The concept of Trusted Services Managers (TSMs) has always intrigued me. The need for industries, as diverse as, telecom, transit and payments, having to work together is a daunting prospect. A neutral third-party, aka TSM, seems like a natural fit to facilitate interactions between these industry players, each of whom have different approaches to the same problem.

As we extend the concept of TSMs to reality, some wrinkles appear.

An observation that is common across NFC trials is about the number of partners (last count there were 6-8 partners) that need to be coordinated with. The complexity resulting from the number of partners is a hurdle, especially as one goes past trials and plans for commercial deployments.

TSMs also provide OTA services. Traditionally, OTA services have been provided by the card issuer, among others. In the telecom world, the telecom service provider (telco) have provided OTA services themselves, using OTA platforms from third-parties, such as, SmartTrust.

Reading between the lines of what telcos are saying and doing (around NFC trials), it appears that in the brave new of world of NFC, the telco will continue to provide OTA services. From a telco's perspective, this reduces the number of interfaces/participants to work with. Additionally, as ETSI has adopted the Single-Wire Protocol (SWP) as the standard, the SIM has become the secure element of choice, and the telco the issuer of the secure element. At the least, the telco would like to paint such a picture. Against this backdrop, the telco has a vested interest and a supporting business model (managing the secure element real-estate) to manage the relationships with third-parties, including banks and transit operators.

Alternatively, the SIM card vendor (G&D, Gemalto...) are better positioned to work with telcos to manage the SIM/secure element real estate, and have good relationships (both business and operational) with payment card issuers.

While TSMs (Venyon, Cassis...) would continue to be in the news for the next 3-5 years as the NFC ecosystem ramps up, it is uncertain whether independent TSMs (TSMs that are not part of SIM card vendors, telcos, financial services providers [e.g., First Data] ) would be able to succeed thereafter.

A question to ponder: What kind of business and usage models would enable independent TSMs to flourish as the NFC ecosystem ramps up and consolidates?

1 comment:

  1. TSM constelation will be definety a very important factor in the deployment of NFC... and surely other services related to mobile...

    the only problem is that apparently (at least in Europe) the final configuration and reality of TSM may be left to "natural selection" since no common legislation seems to be developed in that issue.

    My guess is that the first sectors to explote (transport in EU and probably mPayments in the) will define the TSM with more potential of succiding in the TSM selection... in the end it's nonsense to think of as meny TSMs as services as then a interaction between them will be as complex as the n x m (VASPs*MNOs) combinations everybody wants to avoid by implementing the TSM...

    The problem is that natural selection takes time and the potential of disfunction is very high and risky...

    Cheers, Keim